🕵️ Where's the line between monitoring and spying on your team?

Hey HR folks! 👋 

Today we're talking about the update nobody voted on.

Microsoft just shipped a Teams feature called Workplace Check-in that reads your office Wi-Fi connection and reports which building you're working from, straight to your team, manager included.

Before we get into it, what do you think about this “Workplace Check-In” feature by Microsoft?

PRESENTED BY WORKABLE

The agent recruits. You manage talent.

Sourcing candidates and screening them against the job spec is a leaky bucket. While you're sifting through resumes, your top candidates are receiving offers elsewhere.

With the Workable Agent you don't lose a second, or a potential star employee.

Workable is a talent management platform for an agentic world. The Workable Agent runs the top of the hiring funnel, sourcing, screening, and qualifying every candidate against the spec, around the clock, inside a deep ATS that gives it the context to act safely. Recruiters spend less time processing applications and more time on the conversations that need judgment.

Plus now every new and existing Workable customer gets 1,000 free credits to test out the Agent.

Trusted by 35,000+ companies.

IN TODAY’S EDITION

• 👀 The line between monitoring and surveillance gets harder to tell apart

• ☕ The Break Room: how much visibility do you actually have into what your company's software can already track?

• 📚 Additional Reading: tech's layoff surge, an NLRB ruling on a Slack-message firing, and Microsoft's next round of cuts

OPENING THOUGHTS

👀 The line between monitoring and surveillance gets harder to tell apart

Microsoft's Workplace Check-in shipped inside Teams this month, an extension of a room-booking tool that now reads your office Wi-Fi connection and reports which building, sometimes which floor, you're working from straight to your team, manager included.

When a Teams user asked Microsoft's own president of Teamwork Experiences, Lan Ye, point blank why Teams is "designed to tattle on employees at every turn," she answered that Teams "does not track employees' movements or attendance." True in the narrowest possible sense.

It dodges what the feature actually does once a manager asks someone to turn it on.

Microsoft says the feature is off by default and employees can decline to share it. Both things are real.

Neither changes the fact that "voluntary" evaporates the moment showing your building becomes a soft expectation of returning to office, or that a feature storing no data today is one policy change away from storing it tomorrow.

None of this required a company to buy a surveillance product. It arrived as a software update, decided somewhere between engineering and legal, not in an HR policy meeting.

LET’S UNPICK

Zoom out and Microsoft isn't the outlier here, it's the preview.

Three employers (and probably more), hit some version of the same wall this year, and together they sketch out where this is headed for you. ➡️ 

1️⃣ Start with AT&T. The company built a "presence reporting" system stitched together from badge swipes, mobile location data, and laptop network connections to catch RTO "freeloaders." It worked, in the narrow sense that AT&T says it identified who it was looking for. 👀 But employees hit what the company itself described as "the brink of frustration," and AT&T found its own tracking data wasn't reliable enough to justify keeping the system running at full strength. It's now easing off company-wide.

2️⃣ Meta had a similar reckoning from the other direction. Its "Model Capability Initiative" tracked employee keystrokes, clicks, code changes, and clipboard activity to train AI, and it lasted about as long as it took employees to notice. Meta added pause controls and opt-out requests after the backlash.

Two employers, two different tools, the same outcome: monitor first, explain later, walk back once the trust damage shows up in headlines.

3️⃣ Target is running the opposite experiment. Its new Attendance Tracking Points System, live for store and warehouse workers starting this September, assigns 0.25 points for arriving more than eight minutes late, accumulating toward automatic termination at 12 points. Clean on paper. It also removes the manager judgment call that used to catch context, a delayed train, a sick kid, before it turned into a disciplinary record.

Regardless of which side of this split your org falls on: regulators are done waiting for employers to sort this out on their own. Maine's new surveillance law, effective this January, requires written notice before any electronic monitoring begins, disclosure to candidates during interviews, and annual notice to existing staff, with fines for violations. It joins New York, Connecticut, and California's AB 1221 in requiring employers to say out loud what they're tracking and why. 👏 

Monitoring tools are shipping faster than monitoring policy, in your tech stack and in state legislatures. If you don't have a documented answer to "what can our systems track, and who approved it," the next audit, lawsuit, or leaked Slack thread will write that policy for you.

You can read more at:

🔗 Futurism — Microsoft Announces New Feature That Narcs on You to Your Boss

🔗 The HR Digest — AT&T Eases Attendance Tracking as Discussions on Workplace Surveillance Grow

🔗 HR Grapevine — Meta Faces Employee Backlash Over AI Tracking Tool as Privacy Concerns Grow

TAKEAWAY AND TRY

1. 📋 Inventory what's already capable of tracking employees in your stack. Teams, Slack, badge systems, scheduling software, most of it shipped with monitoring capability built in, whether or not anyone flipped it on. You can't govern what you haven't mapped.

2. 📝 Write the monitoring policy before a vendor update forces the issue. If Microsoft, Meta, or your HRIS provider can push a tracking feature live with a software update, "we'll deal with it when it comes up" isn't a policy, it's a gap.

3. ⚖️ Get ahead of disclosure requirements now, not after a complaint. Maine, New York, Connecticut, and California all now require written notice before monitoring begins. Build the habit into onboarding and annual comms regardless of where you operate, the trend line only points toward more states following.

4. 🧯 Run a "backlash test" before switching anything on. Before enabling a location or activity-tracking feature, ask what happens if it leaks internally or goes public the way Meta's and AT&T's did. If the honest answer is "that would be bad," you have your answer on whether it should default to on.

5. 🚧 Keep coordination tools separate from consequence tools. A status update that helps coworkers find each other is different from a data point that can trigger discipline. The moment "I can see where you are" starts feeding into performance or attendance decisions, it needs the oversight of a policy, not a Wi-Fi setting.

TLDR;

Microsoft's new Wi-Fi tracking feature, AT&T's and Meta's walk-backs, and Target's new point system all point to the same thing: monitoring tools are shipping faster than the policies to govern them. States are stepping in with disclosure laws because employers haven't. Build your governance answer now, before a vendor default, a lawsuit, or a leaked Slack thread writes it for you.

YOUR TAKE

ADDITIONAL READING

1. 📉 Tech accounts for nearly a third of US layoffs in the first half of 2026 — HR Dive. Challenger, Gray & Christmas found tech sector job cuts jumped 83% year-over-year to 139,156 through June, with AI cited as the top driver of layoffs for a fourth straight month.

2. ⚖️ Atlassian ordered to reinstate engineer sacked over Slack clash with leadership — HRD America. An NLRB judge ruled Atlassian illegally fired an engineer for confrontational Slack messages aimed at its co-founder, finding the company couldn't show other employees who posted similar comments faced discipline. A good reminder that "protected concerted activity" covers more than HR teams often assume.

3. 💻 Microsoft layoffs to put more jobs at risk this week — The HR Digest. Microsoft is cutting 5,000 to 5,700 roles, mostly in sales, consulting, and Xbox, as its new fiscal year begins, continuing a pattern of July restructuring seen in 2025.

That’s It For Today!

Thanks for reading to the end and we hope today’s edition sparked some new ideas for your workplace! 🧠

We know you’re super busy and really appreciate you saving some room for us in your inbox 😀